Friday, October 31, 2008

The Rise of the Green-Collar Worker

The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has released "Green Jobs: Toward Decent Work in a Sustainable, Low-Carbon World," a report billed as the "first comprehensive report on the emergence of a 'green economy' and its impact on the world of work in the 21st century."

The report finds that, while the bulk of green jobs are being generated in developed countries, the developing world is making impressive strides.

A project in Bangladesh that trains women and local youths to become certified solar energy technicians plans to create 100,000 jobs.

India looks to create 250,000 jobs through a program that will replace nine million cooking stoves more efficient ones.

The report concludes that "a green economy can generate more and better jobs everywhere and that these can be decent jobs."

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Beyond the Banks: Bail Out the Environment, Create Jobs" (Worldwatch Institute, October 29, 2008)
  • Download "Green Jobs: Towards Decent Work in a Sustainable, Low-Carbon World" (United Nations Environment Programme, September 2008)
  • Read "Unions and Conservationists Call for 'Green Collar' Jobs" (ABC Radio Australia, October 30, 2008)
GET INVOLVED
  • Sign the "We Can Solve It" petition urging the US Congress to support incentives for clean energy jobs
  • Sign the "I'm Ready" petition urging the US government to invest in green jobs and a Clean Energy Corps
photo courtesy VHfc (detail of "Atomium," a huge model of an iron molecule built as a landmark for the Brussels 1958 World Fair, meant to last 10 years)

Thursday, October 30, 2008

So Long to Species at Walden (Yellowstone, Too)

Walden Pond, a 61-acre pond located in Concord, Massachusetts, was made famous by "Walden; or, Life in the Woods," a transcendentalist tome by Henry David Thoreau.

Written in 1854 when the philosopher lived by the pond on land owned by the founder of transcendentalism, Ralph Waldo Emerson, "Walden" contains a critique of modern consumerism, calling for a deeper connection between man and nature.

Though the book has long been part of the canon of American literature, it would seem that society hasn't quite heeded its call.

Many of Walden Pond's plant species -- including buttercups, dogwoods, lilies, orchids, roses and violets -- are dying out due to climate change.

A new study, published in this week's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has found that 25 percent (120 of the 473 species that were documented by Thoreau) have vanished. Thirty-four percent -- 156 species -- are quickly approaching extinction.

On the other side of the country, spanning the states of Wyoming, Montana and Idaho, another iconic American location -- Yellowstone National Park -- reveals an even grimmer situation.

A different study in the same journal has found that in the last 16 years, the number of permanently dry ponds in the park have quadrupled.

As a result of the water loss, half of the area's amphibian species have died out, including the boreal chorus frog (pictured) and the Columbia spotted frog.

Conservationists such as the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and Conservation International (CI) are trying to stem the tide of extinction, but they are fighting against global warming's seemingly unstoppable death march.

Perhaps they should look to Thoreau's classic for inspiration: "If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be. Now put the foundations under them."

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Walden Pond, Yellowstone species dying out" (Scientific American, October 28, 2008)
  • Visit the IUCN 2008 Congress Web site
  • Read the IUCN "Red List" of endangered species
GET INVOLVED
  • Donate to support Conservation International campaigns to protect biodiversity hotspots around the globe
  • Do these ten things recommended by Countdown 2010 to help stop biodiversity loss
  • Sign a petition to the United Nations to show your support of biodiversity
photo: Royal Olive

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Greenpeace Unveils Sweeping Climate Change Plan, With JFK's Help

In 1961, President John F. Kennedy challenged America to land on the moon, inspiring a generation to study science and actually do it. Now, Greenpeace has a created a video, remixing footage of JFK with a call -- in his voice -- to combat global warming. The video is helping to launch their ambitious global plan to achieve a renewable and sustainable energy solution called the "Energy [R]evolution."

Developed with researchers from the Institute of Technical Thermodynamics at the German Aerospace Centre (DLR) and over 30 scientists from academia and green business, the plan focuses on respecting natural limits, phasing out dirty energy and "decoupling growth from fossil fuel use," among host of other objectives, in an attempt reduce global carbon emissions from the energy and transport sectors by over 50% by 2050.


GET INFORMED

  • Watch the Greenpeace "Energy [R]evolution" video featuring JFK
GET INVOLVED
  • Join the Greenpeace "Energy [R]evolution"
  • Sign the "We Can Solve It" petition for a global treaty on climate change
  • Analyze and reduce your impact on the environment with the National Grid Floe
photo: purpletwinkie

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Save Kolahoi, Save Kashmir

A crucial glacier in Kashmir is rapidly disappearing -- time for the violence to stop and create the "Kolahoi Accord"






"Oh, pilot of the storm who leaves no trace, like thoughts inside a dream
Heed the path that led me to that place, yellow desert stream
My Shangri-La beneath the summer moon, I will return again
Sure as the dust that floats high and true, when movin' through Kashmir."

- Robert Plant, "Kashmir," 1975

Though its lyrics were inspired by a 1973 drive through the Sahara Desert in Morocco, Led Zeppelin's famous song is named after a majestic and fertile valley nestled between the Great and Middle Himalayas. Unsurprisingly, Kashmir has always been a mystical place, and not just to the people of Central Asia.

In the early first millennium, it was a hotbed of Hinduism and later, Buddhism. Since the middle of the 14th century, Kashmir has been variously ruled by the Muslims, the Mughal Empire, the Afghan Durranis, the Sikhs, the Dogras and the British Empire. Today, India, Pakistan and China all lay claim to this beautiful region surrounded by deep gorges carved by the Indus River.

The clashes of recent months between Indian troops and Muslim militants have resulted in over 40 deaths and have led to India's tightening military grip. There are now around 600,000 Indian troops deployed there.

On Monday, separatists called a general strike to mark the anniversary of the day when the Indian army took control in 1947. Businesses, schools, banks and government offices were closed in an attempt to stop a plan to create a human chain as part of a peaceful protest to Indian occupation.

Though this day has been marked by the separatists since the militant uprisings began in 1988, this is the first year that Indian officials took such harsh counterinsurgency measures. Their troops have killed five militants during a gun battle in the forests of Kishtiwar. Seventeen others were reported injured.

But violence is just the tip of Kashmir's iceberg, so to speak. Kolahoi, a twin-peaked glacier rising almost 18,000 feet (5,500m) into the sky, is rapidly melting due to global warming. The glacier's importance cannot be overestimated: Kolahoi is the region's only source of year-round fresh water, and is the origin of the valley's teeming apple orchards and rich fields of wheat, corn, rice and saffron.

Given the violence, Kolahoi has not been the most accessible place for scientists to visit. But local reports suggest that it has retreated up to half a mile (800 meters) since the mid-1980s. Geologists estimate that, at the current melt rate, the glacier will be totally gone in ten years.

In August, President Asif Ali Zardari of Pakistan and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh of India agreed to reopen trade in Kashmir in a commendable rapprochement that will hopefully bear fruit as more and more Kashmiris interact with some level of normalcy and get past 60 years of infighting. Last month was Ramadan, and Kashmir was relatively quiet as Muslims spent the holiest month of the Islamic calendar in prayer, reflection and fasting.

The latest skirmishes show that it will take more than political handshaking and spiritual contemplation to tamp down on the aggression. Perhaps the slow death of Kashmir's lush valley will finally give its various inhabitants a reason to put down their arms and find a common cause.

President Zardari and Prime Minister Singh should take this opportunity to form a "Kolahoi Accord" that creates a bilateral research and development committee with members from local governments, green businesses, trade unions and environmental organizations such as The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) in Delhi and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in Pakistan to come up with a sustainable solution to save Kolahoi.

Parts of the plan could include trade incentives on goods that depend on a healthy glacier, the development of ecotourism and other market-driven initiatives to improve the livelihood of millions of Kashmiris.

And the Kashmiri youth are already one step ahead of the violence that has riddled Kashmir's past. Instead of guns, they carry cameras to record instances of abuse, which are then posted on the internet. Perhaps if India allows peaceful protest and reduces the military tension a bit, the young photographers could be enlisted to train their lenses on recording the effects of the receding glacier instead of on public beatings by the police.

Whatever a Kolahoi Accord may or may not accomplish, if it means giving the violence a temporary rest to ponder the future of a glacier that everybody needs, it's certainly worth the effort.

While devising a plan for Kolahoi, Messrs. Zardari and Singh would do well to listen to some other lyrics from "Kashmir" as a message of warning:

"All I see turns to brown, as the sun burns the ground
And my eyes fill with sand, as I scan this wasted land
Trying to find, trying to find where I've been."

GET INVOLVED
  • Sign a petition urging UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, President Zardari and Prime Minister Singh to create and sign a Kolahoi Accord by 2011
Photo of Kolahoi glacier courtesy of Motographer. Map courtesy of Planemad.

Monday, October 27, 2008

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Alfredo Quarto, Executive Director of the Mangrove Action Project

Twenty-eight years ago, while working as an aeronautical engineer for Boeing, Alfredo Quarto seized an opportunity to become a full-time Greenpeace activist. Now, as the founder and executive director of the Seattle-based Mangrove Action Project, Alfredo has found his own critical mission: saving the Earth’s mangroves.

Known as “rainforests by the sea,” mangrove forests not only help provide indigenous populations with food, fuel and building material, they also create critical “buffer zones” between the land and the sea that limit loss of life and habitats during tropical storms. Once covering over 32 million hectares along tropical and subtropical coastlines around the world -- about the size of 70 million football fields -- mangroves now occupy less than half that area.

13.7 Billion Years asked Alfredo some questions to find out what happened and what he’s doing to save these little-known but very important plants.

How did you make the change from being an aeronautical engineer to activist?

I was actually working as a volunteer for Greenpeace in Seattle at the same time I worked for Boeing. When I saw an opportunity to work for Greenpeace on assignment in Japan in 1980, I quit Boeing to become a full-time activist.

That must’ve been quite a pay cut!

Greenpeace paid me seven dollars a day -- a far cry from my engineering pay, but I love Japanese food! And the people there were friendly. I was enriched in spirit by the experience.

How were you first introduced to mangroves?

I found out that activism is quite wearing on one’s private life and finances. I needed a break, and I decided to start a new career in photojournalism. I became involved in mangrove issues in 1992, while on a photojournalist assignment for an article in Cultural Survival Quarterly. My second writing effort for the journal, “Fishers Among the Mangroves,” paid me two free copies of their magazine, which I still have.

Why did you start the Mangrove Action Project?

I discovered that the single issue of mangrove destruction as a result of shrimp farming contained components of several issues I had been involved with in the past: indigenous communities, endangered species, marine ecology and human rights violations. It just seemed quite appropriate and timely to start up the Mangrove Action Project. Thankfully, we have received a lot of moral support for our network from around the world.

What exactly is a mangrove?

Mangroves are taxonomically diverse, salt-tolerant trees and other plant species, which thrive in inter-tidal zones of sheltered tropical and subtropical shores. They have special roots and leaves that enable them to live in salty wetlands where other plants cannot survive.

Mangroves at Emerson Point Park, Palmetto, Florida (courtesy of rusty one)

How long have they been around and where do they live?

The earliest mangrove species originated around Indonesia and Malaysia. Some of these early species spread westward on ocean currents, to India and East Africa, and eastward to the Americas, arriving in Central and South America between 66 and 23 million years ago. During that time, they spread throughout the Caribbean Sea across an open seaway which once existed where Panama lies today. Later, sea currents may have carried mangrove seeds to the western coast of Africa and as far south as New Zealand. Four species of mangroves exist along portions of the coasts of the southern United States.

Why are mangroves good for the environment?

They give stability to coastlines, providing protection from erosion. Vital coral reefs and sea grass beds are also protected from damaging siltation or land-borne pollutants. Mangroves have also been useful in treating effluent, as they absorb excess nitrates and phosphates, preventing the contamination of near-shore waters. And, with a capacity to sequester large amounts of carbon from the air and store immense quantities of carbon in their soils, mangroves help reduce the effects of global warming.

Mangrove coastline, North Island, New Zealand (courtesy of Carmelo Aquilina)


Do animals benefit from healthy mangrove forests?

Mangroves are prime nesting and migratory sites for hundreds of bird species. Over 500 species of birds have been recorded in mangrove areas in Belize alone. Shallow mangrove wetlands offer refuge and nursery grounds for juvenile fish, crabs, shrimps and mollusks. Sea turtles, manatees, crab-eating monkeys, fishing cats, monitor lizards and mud-skipper fish all use the mangrove wetlands for their survival. Even the detritus from mangroves -- mainly fallen leaves and branches -- provide vital nutrients for the marine environment and support immense varieties of sea life in intricate food. So mangroves are very important to healthy coastal ecosystems, from microscopic planktonic algae all the way up the food chain.


Proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus), Malaysia (courtesy of micrognostic)



How do coastal communities use mangroves?

Mangrove wetlands have been likened to supermarkets for the local communities, where people can find everything they might need for their everyday lives. Traditionally, mangrove ecosystems have been sustainably managed by local populations for the production of food such as fish, crabs, shellfish and shrimp, as well as tannins for fishing nets, dyes for cloth, wood for fuel and building material, feed for livestock and various medicines. For millions of indigenous coastal residents, mangrove forests offer dependable, basic livelihoods and sustain their traditional cultures.

What is the mangrove “buffer zone”?

Mangrove forests literally live in two worlds at once, creating “buffer zones” between land and sea. This barrier helps minimize damage of property and losses of life from tsunamis, hurricanes and storms. In regions where these coastal fringe forests have been cleared, tremendous problems of erosion have arisen, and sometimes terrible losses to human life and property have occurred due to destructive storms.

When was the first time people knew that mangroves created these buffer zones?

Tropical and sub-tropical indigenous coastal peoples knew about this attribute of mangroves as a buffer zone against storm surges and cyclone winds perhaps thousands of years ago.

It seems that the Cyclone Nargis that hit Myanmar in May made a lot of people aware of mangrove deforestation for the first time.

It took a tsunami, several cyclones or hurricanes and massive losses of lives and livelihoods to awaken a sleeping public to the overall effect of mangrove loss and degradation.

What are the reasons for mangrove deforestation?

Mangrove forests are naturally resilient and have withstood severe storms and changing tides for many millennia, but they are now being devastated by modern encroachments. The rapidly expanding shrimp aquaculture industry poses one of the gravest threats to the world’s remaining mangroves. Literally thousands of hectares of lush mangrove forests have been cleared to make room for the artificial shrimp ponds of this boom and bust industry. This highly volatile enterprise has grown exponentially over the last 25 years, leaving devastating ruin in its wake. The charcoal and timber industries have also severely impacted mangrove forests, as well as tourism and other coastal developments. Additionally, lenticels -- the porous spots on the exposed portions of mangrove roots -- are highly susceptible to clogging by crude oil and other pollutants, attacks by parasites and prolonged flooding from artificial dikes or causeways. Over time, environmental stress can kill large numbers of mangrove trees.

Of all these reasons, would you say that the shrimp industry is the biggest culprit?

Globally, up to thirty percent of recent mangrove destruction has been due to clearing for shrimp farms. Industrial shrimp aquaculture development is responsible for much of the mangrove destruction over the past two decades. High consumer demand for cheap shrimp in Japan, US and the EU has been the driving force behind this rapidly accelerating industry.

What is the current status of mangrove loss?

Today, mangrove forests are among the most threatened habitats in the world -- disappearing at an annual rate of one or two percent, yet with little public notice. The actual amount of mangrove forest destruction is alarming. Thailand has lost more than half of its mangrove forests since 1960. In the Philippines, mangroves have declined from almost 450,000 hectares in the 1920s to only a little over 100,000 hectares in 1990. In Ecuador, estimates of mangrove loss range from 20% percent to nearly one half of Ecuador’s once 362,000 hectares of mangrove-forested coastline. The Muisne region of Ecuador alone has lost nearly 90% percent of its mangroves.

Is there a way to protect mangrove forests and also have human coastal development?

Yes, there is a way to both manage the mangrove forest areas for sustainable use, while also conserving the resources of the mangroves to ensure a healthy, biodiverse ecosystem for future generations to enjoy and benefit from. In Thailand, for instance, MAP is working with a couple of great non-governmental organizations that are promoting community-based tourism. The Thailand Community Based Tourism Institute and Andaman Discoveries are both successfully combining eco-tourism with conservation and restoration, effectively involving local community members in the process, so that the local communities both learn from and co-manage the projects.

Outside of eco-tourism, are there other market-driven solutions for conservation?

Other kinds of market-driven solutions can work if they do not involve compromises with industry that negate the conservation effectiveness in the process. Today, there are many market-driven schemes involving certification of shrimp, for instance, that are not adequate for conserving mangrove ecosystem functions, nor are adequate for protecting the basic rights to livelihood of the indigenous and local coastal communities. Yet these flawed certification schemes are proliferating today, confusing the consumer public, while allowing further coastal degradation and social ills to flourish in the wake of industry profits.

In poor countries where mangroves exist, cutting them down for land development can create jobs and boost economies. How do you explain to someone who needs a job that it’s better to keep the mangroves and not build a golf course or a shrimp farm?

Mangroves are worth much more than the value of private enterprise, especially in the long term. There are several revealing evaluations comparing the worth of mangroves to the profits earned by developments, such as shrimp farming. In the end, conserving healthy mangrove wetlands pays much higher dividends.

How does mangrove deforestation affect people who don’t live near tropical or sub-tropical coastlines?

Well, since mangroves play an important role in combating climate change by sequestering carbon from the air and holding carbon in storage beneath their roots, their survival is important for all of us. Also, the wild commercial fisheries are enhanced by healthy mangroves, with a noticeable drop in fisheries production with mangrove loss. Plus, there are potential healing medicines to fight HIV and other human ailments that can be extracted from mangrove bark, leaves or roots. Also, for bird enthusiasts. mangroves are vital stop-over sites for migratory birds which rest and feed in the mangrove wetlands during their long migrations North or South.

What can people do to help keep mangrove forests healthy?

If people in the United States would reduce their consumption of shrimp, this would help greatly in protecting the mangroves and related coastal wetlands. Also, put pressure on the tourism industry to not develop coastal mangrove areas for mass tourism and golf courses. People can also help support the global grassroots movements that are aiming to conserve mangroves and promote the rights and abilities of indigenous and local communities to manage and conserve their mangrove forest resources. And of course, people can also become supporting members of MAP. An informed public is an effective watchdog against ecological dangers.

What are some of the problems facing current mangrove reforestation initiatives?

Major restoration efforts that have both preceded and followed the tsunami of 2004 have been large-scale failures because of a lack of ecological finesse in the attempted restoration process. According to MAP’s chief technical advisor, Robin Lewis, so-called “restoration” has more often actually been afforestation, whereby mangrove seedlings were planted in inappropriate areas, including in sea grass beds, mud flats and salt flats, with little chance for survival, and usually with little follow-up monitoring and evaluation to properly assess the “restoration” process. “Success” of past mangrove planting projects is often shallowly defined in terms of number of seedlings planted, with little regard to the status of these mass plantings after the fact. If one plants 300,000 seedlings, as occurred in Banda Aceh after the tsunami, and all of these are soon destroyed by wave action and floating debris, then this is a dismal failure. Even if the original planting attempt was impressive in scale, the results must be judged by the survival rates experienced over a prolonged time span of 10 years or more after the fact.

Do governments share any of the blame?

Until recently, mangrove forests have been classified by many governments and industries as wastelands or useless, mosquito-infested swamps. This erroneous designation has made it easier to exploit mangrove forests as cheap and unprotected sources of land and water for shrimp farming. The Mexican government is selling the mangrove areas for around $1,000 per hectare, though a study by the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, California, found that over a 30-year-period, mangroves should be valued at more than $600,000 per hectare.

So are some governments making progress?

Overall, steps have been and still are being taken to pass legislation and issue guidelines for managing and conserving mangroves. However, a general lack of commitment to effective enforcement and prosecution of offenders is problematic, and mangrove loss continues, often unabated.

Should local communities play a larger role in mangrove conservation and reforestation?

Definitely. Local community rights should be strengthened. Indigenous people should be able to both manage and conserve mangrove areas because these communities are 24/7 on the scene and in the vicinity of any violations. They can better monitor and prevent violations of the laws protecting mangroves.

Has mangrove reforestation received any major funding?

In the early 1990s, a $30 million World Bank loan was issued to undertake a five-year mangrove restoration effort along Thailand’s coasts. However, the program required a certain number of hectares to be planted per year, and this loan stipulation led to some Thai officials in charge of the restoration to authorize plantings in sea grass beds, mud flats and salt flats. They even allowed clear-cutting of healthy mangrove forests just to replant them with seedlings to meet their annual acreage quota. Needless to say, the bulk of that $30 million and the massive manpower that went into the hand planting were wasted, and more harm than good was caused in certain instances when healthy inter-tidal ecosystems were converted into unhealthy and failing mangrove plantations.


Mangrove nursery, Mazatlan, Mexico (courtesy of
Mirandala)



What can be done to prevent these massive failures?

There is that wise adage that those who do not learn the lessons of history are bound to repeat its mistakes. This definitely applies to past and present attempts to restore mangroves. What is needed is a more scientific and ecological approach to mangrove restoration that involves planting the right species in the right locations.

What is MAP doing to help people, politicians and conservationists move mangrove conservation forward in a constructive way?

We are active on many fronts, but with only a small staff and volunteers, we are quite challenged. MAP is carrying forward a five-pronged approach, including networking, advocacy, conservation and restoration, education and sustainable community development.

Are there efforts to educate children about this issue?

Mangroves still need a tremendous boost in awareness-raising concerning their importance and relevance to healthy coastal ecosystems. With this tremendous challenge comes opportunity to reach the future generations and educate them about the importance of mangroves. This education component is urgently needed, and towards this end, MAP has developed a 300-page Mangrove Curriculum for the primary schools in the global South. The curriculum is now being introduced into schools in the Caribbean, South America and Asia. Also, MAP has run a Children’s Mangrove Art Competition whose winners from 12 nations have their art works published in our annual calendar. The 2009 Children’s Art Calendar is now at the printer, and will soon be available for purchase.

What about informing consumers?

MAP has launched a consumer awareness and markets campaign, “Shrimp Less, Think More,” which aims to reduce consumer demand for shrimp in the United States, thus reducing destructive expansion of the shrimp industry into more mangrove areas. The campaign is active throughout the West Coast from Seattle to San Francisco. If we as conscientious planetary citizens reduce our consumption of shrimp, we can put some brakes an otherwise runaway shrimp farm industry.

Are you involved in any restoration projects?

We are promoting the Ecological Mangrove Restoration (EMR) method, developed by Robin Lewis, which involves understanding both the individual species and the community ecology, adequate monitoring of replanting progress, resolving land ownership and use issues. Reaching far beyond just planting of seedlings, MAP’s EMR program, which restores natural water flows, greatly increases the overall success rate for restoring large areas of degraded mangrove forests. The method is also cost-effective and produces a more biodiverse restoration with long-term results. A program for monitoring and evaluation of restored sites is built into the EMR process with a 5-10 year plan to ensure success of the endeavor over the longer term. Active MAP EMR projects are now in progress in Asia and in Florida.

Have you seen success with the EMR method?

It has proven extremely successful in past endeavors, such as in West Lake, Florida, and is being attempted on a small-scale basis in India, Indonesia and Thailand.

Can political tools like trade embargoes help mangrove conservation?

Yes, but with the WTO overruling countries’ rights to set limits to outside development pressures, this can limit the effectiveness and political will to conserve resources. Also, business interests and money can too often corrupt and persuade politicians to turn a blind eye to violations. In many nations in the global South, political and military figures are often themselves investors in the destructive development ventures, thus creating a classic case of conflict of interest.

Science attempts to understand reality. Activism attempts to change current conventions. Should the two meet, and if so, where? Can science or activism hurt the other's goals?

Science and activism must meet and find a common language of sorts to help solve the problems of today, so that we will have a tomorrow. Activism can become an effective bridge to allow the findings of science to cross over to a larger public. Non-governmental organizations can be the liaisons between the scientists and the local communities, allowing a more expedient way to disseminate the solutions that science may uncover. But modern science must also respect and incorporate the traditional wisdom of indigenous and local communities, realizing that their truth and traditional wisdom can complement, not hinder, those scientists seeking truth. Science and activism can hurt each other if either attempts to ignore the truth and importance of the other.

The MAP Web site states that your organization believes “in the laws of physics, which state that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” How does that translate to human development on one side and conservation on the other side?

If human development ignores the necessity for conservation and sustainability for the present, the results will be a wasted planet and unstable human civilization for the future. Human development must go hand in hand with the principles of conservation in order to thrive and survive.

With the oil crisis, the food crisis, the water crisis, surging, population growth and climate change, it seems difficult for different countries to agree and create a unified, international plan to solve problems that affect us all, either directly or indirectly. What do you think is the biggest problem facing humanity today? Are all these issues connected?

Yes, these issues are all connected in a web of mismanagement and shortsightedness with a mad dash of greed on the side. The industrialization and privatization of our common resource base, including those resources we obtain from agriculture, fisheries and forestry, have sacked our global economy and the legacy for our children is being drained away. Without immediate remedial action, we may have set in motion the ruin of our planet’s health and vitality. So-called “free trade” is really opening up doors for those with the means to obtain more means, while those already poor must face impoverishment of their livelihoods and cultures.


Raw shrimp (courtesy of cobalt123)



What would you say to someone who loves to eat shrimp?

You must choose between the immediate gratification for your desire for shrimp and the longer-term need for a healthy planet. What legacy you leave your children and your children’s children depends upon your actions today. Would you rather choose a legacy of rotten shrimp carapaces piled high to the sky, or one of careful planning and respect for the planet we share with so many other creatures. If you must eat shrimp, please follow the advice of our “Shrimp Less, Think More” campaign, and eat only shrimp caught or produced in the United States or Canada. These shrimp are caught or raised with much more effective regulations in place and improvements being made, whereas imported shrimp from the global South too often carries with it the terrible burden of social injustice and ecological ruin. When you are enticed by the ads of Red Lobster or Skippers with “All the Shrimp You Can Eat” buffets, ask yourself, knowing the issues, “How much shrimp can you stomach?”

Where do you see yourself in 10 years?

MAP is short on funds but rich in energy and spirit. Nevertheless, we are seeking more funding to continue the work ahead. In 10 years, I’d like to be struggling less and accomplishing much more with a small full-time staff, small manageable offices in Seattle, Asia, Latin America and Africa, and some wonderful volunteers, who are accomplishing great things together!


FURTHER READING
  • For more information about Alfredo Quarto and the Mangrove Action Project, and to sign up for the MAP newsletter, click here.
  • To read Alfredo’s article “Fishers Among the Mangroves,” click here.
RELATED POSTS

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Pack Your Bags, We're Moving to New Zealand

In the late 1960s, he was the first to discover ozone layer-damaging CFCs in the atmosphere. But famed British climatologist and futurist James Lovelock is probably best known for his Gaia hypothesis, a concept he formulated in the early 1970s in which he proposed that the planet Earth was a single "superorganism."

A consequence of his work with NASA in the 1960s researching the possibility of life on Mars, the hypothesis (named after the Greek goddess of the Earth) was popularized in his 1979 book Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth.

Though some respected scientists disagreed with Lovelock's idea of Gaia -- Richard Dawkins, Ford Doolittle and Stephen Jay Gould among them -- many others were supportive and intrigued.

In 1989, Stephen Schneider, a professor of Environmental Biology at Stanford University, organized the American Geophysical Union's first Chapman Conference around the hypothesis. The debate still exists, and since Lovelock first proposed Gaia, he has been one of the first to warn people about the dangers of climate change.

In 2006, the same year as the third international Gaia conference, Lovelock published The Revenge of Gaia: Why the Earth is Fighting Back -- and How We Can Still Save Humanity, in which he postulates that it's too late to stave off most of the effects of global warming, and there will definitely come a time when major portions of the planet become inhospitable for human existence.

Since global warming is inevitable, he argues, the world should turn its attention to finding ways to cope with its effects. According to Lovelock, people will have to move.

In a recent interview with Radio New Zealand, the decorated 89 year-old scientist (he's a Fellow of the Royal Society and a Commander of the British Empire) says that New Zealand's efforts towards passing an Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) -- legislation that is widely expected to become law next week -- is a waste of time.

Instead of devising carbon trading schemes, Lovelock argues that resources should be used to build "proper cities" and prepare the infrastructure and agriculture of island nations to take on what he believes will be a population influx -- once other parts of the world succumb to higher temperatures.

"I think the role of New Zealand, similar to that of the UK and other island nations, is to be a lifeboat because the world may get almost intolerable during the coming century," says Lovelock. "You've seen it happening in Australia already: Desert is spreading and things just won't grow. The island nations like New Zealand will be spared that kind of damage."

"Trying to stop global warming," Lovelock says matter-of-factly, "is almost a certain waste of time."

GET INFORMED
  • Listen to the interview (Radio New Zealand, September 1, 2008)
  • Read "Top British scientist says New Zealand should become 'Lifeboat' for global warming survivors" (RushPRnews, October 25, 2008)
  • Visit James Lovelock's Web site
  • Read "James Lovelock, Gaia's grand old man" (Salon.com, August 17, 2000)
GET INVOLVED
  • Check airfares to New Zealand on TripAdvisor.com
  • Sign the "We Can Solve It" petition for a global treaty on climate change
  • Analyze and reduce your impact on the environment with the National Grid Floe
Photo of James Lovelock speaking World Nuclear Association Symposium, September 2007, courtesy of Jon and Lu. Photo of Earth (File Name AS17-148-22727) courtesy of Earth Sciences and Image Analysis Laboratory, NASA Johnson Space Center.

Saturday, October 25, 2008

A Former Banker's Battle for the Greening of Europe

He was a powerful Wall Street lawyer and a conservative member of Greece's New Democracy Party. He served as the Greek Minister of Industry, Energy and Technology and deputy governor of the Hellenistic Industrial Development Bank. So it was not surprising that the business community cheered while conservationists were left more than a bit glum when Stavros Dimas was appointed the European Union's environment commissioner in 2004. But he has surprised both sides, garnering praise from such stalwart environmental activists as Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and the sustainable transport think-tank T&E.

And now, the prospects of two of his celebrated policies are looking a bit dimmer. One, a fine on carmakers who fail to meet reduced targets of their vehicles' emmisions to fall in line with an EU law that comes into effect in 2012 is being battered by the powerful European auto lobby. The other is a bold plan to reduce the total European carbon emissions by at least 20% from their 1990 levels by 2020, and also to push renewable energy sources to reach a fifth of Europe’s total energy need. This worries the eastern European countries that rely heavily on coal-powered electricity. Mr. Dimas only has the remainder of the year to push through these plans. And environmentalists now find themselves looking to a powerful former banker to get Europe on track for a greener future.

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Climate of fear" (The Economist, October 23, 2008)
GET INVOLVED
  • Sign the "We Can Solve It" petition for a global treaty on climate change
  • Analyze and reduce your impact on the environment with the National Grid Floe
photo: wwf_france

Friday, October 24, 2008

Where Man's Best Friend Is on the Menu

Swathed in a moist, tropical forest of pine and topping off at a nose-bleed altitude of 5,100 feet (1,500 meters), Baguio was rightly designated the "Summer Capital of the Philippines" in 1903. Its name means "moss" in Ibaloi, the region's indigenous language. A presidential mansion sits in the city's cool, orchid-friendly air. But it is also ground zero for the nation's illegal trade in dog meat.

Though the practice has been banned since 1998, the International Humane Society cites that the meat is still available in some of Baguio's restaurants. The organization has posted a video on YouTube of their discovery of several dogs destined for the slaughterhouse -- some still wearing their pet collars. A recent government raid nabbed six of the traders in the Baguio City Public Market. The suspects face a maximum of four years in prison and a fine of 5,000 Philippine pesos ($102).

GET INFORMED
  • Watch "What's That You're Eating? The Philippines' Illegal Dog Meat Trade" (Humane Society of the United States)
  • Read "6 Retailers Charged for Selling Dog Meat" (Sun Star Baguio, August 1, 2008)
GET INVOLVED
  • Sign a Humane Society International petition urging the mayor of Baguio City to crack down on the illegal sale of dog meat and shut down restaurants that serve dog meat
photo: boooooooomblastandruin

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Sharks Get a New Best Friend in Galapagos

Tiburón martillo is Spanish for "hammerhead shark." It's also the name of of a new ship in the Galapagos National Park Service, inaugurated on October 17 as a "floating base station" that will be permanently moored off of Wolf Island in the north of the archipelago. It will serve as both a base for scientific research and a central command for park rangers who will be out patrolling the area in an effort to stop poaching. Several Costa Rican ships have been caught around Wolf and Darwin Island carrying illegal goods -- sharks and shark fins.

Sea Shepherd, a non-profit conservation society founded by one of Greenpeace's three founders Paul Watson, hired two local marine engineers to complete the Tiburón Martillo's crew. Watson should know a thing or two about what it will take to stop poaching. He felt that one of Greenpeace's main aims -- to bear witness to environmental wrongdoing -- was not enough, and started Sea Shepherd as a more aggressive organization, with stated policies to sink or sabotage vessels in violation of international whaling law. In the world of conservation, Paul Watson is what you might call a "badass."

Considered by some an environmental terrorist, by others an eco-pirate and yet by others an eco-warrior, Mr. Watson -- also a board member of the Sierra Club -- has made some big waves and has done his time in jail. But for someone who once said that "earthworms are far more valuable than people," jail probably didn't have too much of an impact on this tough-skinned eco-warrior other than keep him from what he loves to too, which is to save marine wildlife like seals, dolphins and whales, using whatever it takes.

"We should never feel like we’re going too far in breaking the law, because whatever laws you break to liberate animals or to protect the environment are very insignificant compared to the laws that are broken by that parliament of whores in Washington," Watson said at the 2002 Animal Rights Convention. "They are the biggest lawbreakers, the biggest destroyers, the biggest mass-murderers on this planet right now." Given Paul Watson's success in the past, sharks should soon be able to rest a little easier knowing that the Tiburón Martillo is there to keep an eye out for their best interests.

GET INFORMED

  • Read "Sea Shepherd Helps Establish Permanent Base at Darwin and Wolf" (Sea Shepherd, October 17, 2008)
  • Read a Paul Watson interview on the ActivistCash Web Site
GET INVOLVED
  • Join and donate to Sea Shepherd
  • Sign the Shark Trust petition supporting an EU Plan of Action for the protection of sharks
  • Sign a petition supported by Reef Check, Wild Aid and the Humpback Whale Institute urging the United Nations to impose a ban on the finning of sharks
RELATED POSTS
photos: Sea Shepherd

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Doing to Oil What Refrigeration Did to Salt

R. James Woolsey, Jr. believes that dependence on oil poses a serious threat to America's national security. “It’s not just foreign oil," he says in the current issue of Scientific American, "It's oil...people assume everything would be fine if we just had more domestic oil and relied on foreign sources for a smaller share. I think that’s entirely wrong."

He should know. From 1993 to 1995, he served as the director of the Central Intelligence Agency and before that he held various defense and security posts under both Democratic and Republican administrations -- including Under Secretary of the Navy and Advisor on the U.S. Delegation to the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT 1). Among possible security threats, he cites terrorism against Middle East infrastructure, violent regime change or oil cutoff (such as Saudi Arabia practiced in 1973). Woolsey -- currently a member of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) Board of Advisors and an advisor at the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security -- says, "Our major effort ought to be to do to oil what refrigeration did to salt at the end of the 19th century -- to destroy its monopoly."

GET INFORMED
  • Read "For National Security, Get Off Oil" (Scientific American, October, 2008)
GET INVOLVED
  • Sign the National Energy Policy Petition, a citizen-based effort to encourage a US government alternative energy program
  • Sign the Pickens Plan petition urging the US presidential candidates Senators Obama and McCain to tell the public how they plan to reduce American dependence on foreign oil by 30 percent in the next 10 years
photo: Deltrice

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Star Light, Star Bright, Log the First Star You See Tonight

From October 20 through November 3, thousands of people around the world will be staring at the sky, looking for constellations and then sharing their findings online as part of the second annual Great World Wide Star Count. Open to everyone, the event is organized by the Windows to the Universe project at the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) in Boulder, Colorado, in collaboration with American and international planetariums and scientific societies. Last year, the star count drew over 6,600 observers, a number that the organizers hope to double this time around.

Next year, the star count -- which collects data that compares star visibility across different regions of the planet and reveals the impact of surface light on visibility -- will be a part of the 2009 International Year of Astronomy, a worldwide effort led by the International Astronomical Union and the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) to promote public interest in astronomy.

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Star Count Goes Global" (ScienceDaily, October 20, 2008)
GET INVOLVED
  • Join the Great World Wide Star Count
  • Download this month's evening skymap free from Skymaps.com
  • Buy a beginner telescope from the Discovery Channel store ($99.00)
photo: Scutter

Monday, October 20, 2008

Trying to Make Tropical Topical

A little known fungus from Norway made organ transplants possible. The saliva of leeches led to ways to prevent blood clots. The clearing of tropical forests releases about 20% of global greenhouse gases — more than double the amount that comes from all the world's cars and trucks, combined. Many species that help man and other lifeforms are still unknown to science.

Andrew Mitchell of Global Canopy Programme, a forest-conservation group, said, “Rainforests work as a giant natural utility company. If we don’t start paying for it, we will get cut off. Instead of simply preventing the next global credit crunch, it is time to start thinking about averting the rainforest crunch as well.”

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Protect the World's Forests" (Rainforest Action Network)
  • Read "Fewer creatures great and small" (The Economist, October 16, 2008)
GET INVOLVED
  • Protect forest acres to combat climate change
photo: linkwize

Sunday, October 19, 2008

Bad News for Kangaroos: Down Under's Getting Hotter

After three years of field research and predictive computer modeling, Euan G. Ritchie and Elizabeth E. Bolitho of James Cook University in Australia have added to the growing bad news for animals regarding global warming. Their subject: kangaroos. They found that a two-degree Celsius rise in temperature over the next fifty years may cut the kangaroos' geographic range by almost half. A six-degree rise would all but eliminate their present habitat.

Current climate models for Australia predict a two- to six-degree rise in temperature by 2070. One of the most devastating effects of this increased heat will be the loss of surface water. Large swaths of Australia will become dry and parched. And while kangaroos are mobile enough to move around in search of new habitats, they will not likely find the appropriate vegetation and topography to survive.

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Global Warming Threatens Australia's Iconic Kangaroos" (ScienceDaily, October 16, 2008)
GET INVOLVED
  • Sign a petition urging the Australian government to issue a moratorium on commercial and non-commercial killing of kangaroos
  • Sign a PETA petition opposing California's Senate Bill 880, which would legalize kangaroo skin sales in California
  • Sign the "We Can Solve It" petition for a global treaty on climate change
  • Analyze and reduce your impact on the environment with the National Grid Floe
RELATED POSTS
photo: e20ci

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Palin Rebuffed As Unique Alaskan Whales Score Major Victory

The United States National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has responded to a petition filed by several conservation groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity, the National Audubon Society, Defenders of Wildlife and National Resource Defense Council. And a very particular marine mammal can rest a little easier -- the Cook Inlet beluga whale, a genetically distinct animal, geographically isolated to the 180 mile (290 km) stretch of water in south central Alaska where it gets its name. It now enjoys the long-awaited protection of the Endangered Species Act. The decision rebuffs a claim made by the Palin administration last year that the listing was unwarranted, though in 2006, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) placed Delphinapterus leucas on its infamous "Red List" of threatened and endangered species.

For the past decade, its numbers have been cut in half, killed by oil and gas dumping, sewage, shipping and pipeline spills and rising pollution. There are no more than a few hundred left. With this new federal protection, developers of several infrastructure projects such as the Knik Arm Bridge, the Port of Anchorage Expansion, the Chuitna coal strip mine, and the Port MacKenzie expansion will have to work with scientists to ensure the safety of the endangered whales. The New York Times reported on Friday that Governor Palin said the listing was "premature."

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Cook Inlet Beluga Whale Population Listed As Endangered; Conservation Groups Applaud National Marine Fisheries Service Decision" (Center for Biological Diversity, October 17, 2008)
  • Read "Beluga Whale Protection Bolstered; Palin Objects " (New York Times, October 17, 2008)
  • Visit the Center for Biological Diversity Web site
  • Read the IUCN "Red List"
GET INVOLVED
  • Donate to the Center for Biological Diversity
  • Sign the Whale's Revenge petition urging the International Whaling Commission to close the loophole that allows whaling in the name of so-called "scientific research"
  • Adopt and whale or dolphin from the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society
photo: Center for Biological Diversity

Friday, October 17, 2008

If We Really Are What We Eat, Most of Us Are A Bit Disturbing

In "Food, Inc.," documentary filmmaker Robert Kenner takes a close look at big agribusiness, investigating practices in the food industry normally hidden from public view. And the results are grim, indeed. Kenner finds a nation's food supply concentrated in the hands of a few giant corporations whose profit-driven business practices have dramatically reduced levels of food safety. Supermarkets have become danger zones. The human population is regularly bombarded by new strains of e coli bacteria. Diabetes is an epidemic. Obesity is commonplace.

"Some of these chicken houses have 27,000 chickens stuffed in a room without light," Kenner says in an interview in Sunday's issue of the New York Times magazine. In an effort to make the biggest chicken breast, the birds are "designed to grow as rapidly as possible, and their bones cannot keep up with the growth. Some of them are too heavy to stand." The film premiered last month at the Toronto International Film Festival and features fellow food provocateurs Eric Schlosser ("Fast Food Nation") and Michael Pollan ("The Omnivore's Dilemma"). It feeds the growing interest in not only what we have for lunch, but exactly how it got there. And what does Kenner eat these days? "I've become a vegetarian for the last two weeks," he says. "I'm a flexitarian."

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Questions for Robert Kenner: Where's the Beef?" (New York Times, October 12, 2008)
  • Read more about "Food, Inc." on the Participant Media Web site
GET INVOLVED
  • Tell a friend about Prop 2, the Prevention of Cruelty to Farm Animals Act, a landmark initiative in California that would ease the suffering of millions of animals confined in small crates on factory farms
  • Donate to the Humane Society of the United States Vote Yes to Prop 2 Campaign
  • Sign a petition to boycott Kentucky Fried Chicken for animal torture until they adopt a comprehensive animal welfare plan
photo: chocolate monster mel

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Whales vs. Navy in Supreme Court

For years, scientists have said that the sonar used by the US Navy harms marine mammals like dolphins and whales, impeding their ability to communicate, identify food sources and navigate. Two lower courts ruled that the Navy could run operations off the coast of California if it made adjustments, like lowering the power of the sonar when the mammals are within a certain distance.

The Federal District Court in Los Angeles determined that the Navy could successfully carry out operations with these restrictions. But the Navy disagrees. And now the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case. In an editorial on Sunday, the New York Times wrote, "Surely the Supreme Court has the ability to judge whether the military should be allowed to flout environmental laws with a dubious claim of national security."

GET INFORMED
  • Read "The Navy, Whales and the Court" (New York Times, October 10, 2008)
GET INVOLVED
  • Sign the NRDC petition urging Navy Secretary Donald C. Winter to adopt measures to keep marine life safe
  • Send a Citizen Comment urging the National Marine Fisheries Service to reject the Navy's plan for worldwide deployment of dangerous LFA sonar
RELATED POSTS
  • Read "Studying How Whales React to Sonar" (August 11, 2008)
  • Read "US Supreme Court to Decide Between Navy and Whales" (July 6, 2008)
photo: drumsnwhistles

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

In Yosemite, They're Movin' on Up (and Out)

In 1910, Joseph Grinnell -- a field biologist and the director of the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology at the University of California at Berkeley -- wrote a paper in which he spoke to the ecologists of the future, telling them that they could use the data he collected to find out how the animals he studied were doing. Four years later, he began a seven-year study on the wildlife in California's Yosemite National Park.

Now, evolutionary biologist Craig Moritz, the museum's current director, has retraced his predecessor's footsteps. And what a difference almost 90 years makes. Moritz and his colleagues found that Yosemite's average low temperature at night has increased by 6.7 degrees Fahrenheit (3.7 degrees Celsius) since concluded his study. Warmer nights have forced the mammals who live there to move up. Of the 28 species that Grinnell recorded, 16 have moved 3,280 feet (1,000 meters) up the sloped mountain terrain in search for someplace more suitable to live. Three are nearing extinction, like the alpine chimpunk, a mammal unique to California.

GET INFORMED
  • Read "New Homes on the Range: Species Shift Across Yosemite" (Scientific American, October 10, 2008)
GET INVOLVED
  • Sign the "We Can Solve It" petition for a global treaty on climate change
  • Analyze and reduce your impact on the environment with the National Grid Floe
photo: matt.hintsa

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Got Water? Visions of Planet Earth in 2030

The year is 2030. Mankind has failed to combat climate change. The price of oil is more than $400 a barrel, bringing shipping to halt. International trade collapses. A lack of water has forced humans to abandon central Australia and Oklahoma. People move towards collective laundry cleaning. The Olympics happen only in a virtual reality. "Environmental refugees" flee to Antarctica. Wilderness is fast disappearing, existing only in few remaining places on the planet. Borders are closed as pandemics of new diseases rise, brought to life in the greenhouse of warmer weather.

These are some of the possible scenarios put forth in "Climate Futures," a 76-page study written by HP Labs, the exploratory research arm of Hewlett-Packard, and Forum for the Future, a London-based non-profit dedicated to sustainable development. In addition to prognosticating the planet's environmental health, the report discusses the impact of a warmer world on civil liberties, consumerism and terrorism. Could these extreme scenarios scare people? The authors certainly hope so.

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Exotic climate study sees refugees in Antarctica" (Reuters, October 12, 2008)
  • Read "Climate Futures: responses to climate change in 2030" (Forum for the Future, October 13, 2008)
  • Visit HP Labs
  • Visit Forum for the Future
GET INVOLVED
  • Sign the "We Can Solve It" petition for a global treaty on climate change
  • Analyze and reduce your impact on the environment with the National Grid Floe
photo: Pedro.F

Monday, October 13, 2008

A Shark's Immaculate Conception

Tidbit was a female Atlantic blacktip shark living at the Virginia Aquarium and Marine Science Center in Virginia Beach, Virginia. Sadly, she died shortly from complications after being sedated for an annual veterinary examination. The subsequent autopsy found out that she was pregnant. But for the last eight years, she had not been in the company of any males. A DNA test found that Tidbit's embryo contained no DNA from a father. It is the second-ever confirmed case of a "virgin birth" by a shark.

The team that released the Tidbit study in the Journal of Fish Biology was led by Dr. Demian Chapman, a shark scientist with the Institute for Ocean Conservation Science at Stony Brook University. Chapman and another member of the team, Dr. Mahmood Shivji, Director of the Guy Harvey Research Institute and Professor at Nova Southeastern University in Florida, made the groundbreaking first discovery of shark virgin birth in May of last year. The "virgin birth" phenomenon occurs when a baby is conceived without fertilization from male sperm, and has been seen in some bony fish, amphibians, reptiles and birds.

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Virgin shark got pregnant in Virginia aquarium" (Reuters, October 11, 2008)
GET INVOLVED

  • Sign the Shark Trust petition supporting an EU Plan of Action for the protection of sharks
  • Sign a petition supported by Reef Check, Wild Aid and the Humpback Whale Institute urging the United Nations to impose a ban on the finning of sharks
photo: Stony Brook University

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Goodbye, Fish and Chips

It is America's most common seafood product, found in frozen fish sticks, fish and chips and imitation crab meat. Worldwide, it supplies McDonald's with its main ingredient for fish sandwiches. It is Alaska pollock and the world's largest fishery where it is caught is on the verge of collapse. Every year, one million tons of the fish are taken from the sea -- but they cannot reproduce fast enough to meet global demand.

Humans aren't the only ones who eat pollock: Whales, fur seals and the endangered Stellar sea lions rely on it for their survival. In December, the North Pacific Fishery Management Council will meet to set catch limits for 2009. Greenpeace has called for cutting the catch in half. Hopefully, fast food junkies will try to steer clear from ordering the Filet-o-Fish for a little while to give this important fishery a chance to recover.

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Pollock fishery on brink of collapse, Greenpeace says" (Vancouver Sun, October 11, 2008)
GET INVOLVED
  • Download the Environmental Defense Fund's "Pocket Eco-Friendly Fish Selector" to make choices that help prevent overfishing
  • Sign the Pew Environment Group petition urging the US National Marine Fisheries Service to stop overfishing
photo: yuankuei

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Saving Sumatran Forests, Keepers of Carbon

Stretching almost 300,000 square miles across the equator where the Indian Ocean meets the South China Sea, Sumatra is the only place on Earth where elephants, orangutans, rhinos and tigers co-exist. A little bigger than Texas, it is the world's sixth largest island, known in ancient times as the "land of gold" for its large stores of the precious metal. But today, something else deep in its ground is getting a lot of attention: the peat under the forest, and the vast amounts of carbon stored there. As trees are lost to deforestation from the pulp, paper and palm oil industries, the exposed peat oxidizes, releasing greenhouse gases that cause global warming.

In a major move to preserve the country's vital ecosystem -- and to contain as much of the remaining carbon as possible -- four ministers and all 10 governors of Indonesia signed a historic accord in Jakarta to devise a plan to protect endangered forests. The agreement -- helped along by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) -- was formally announced at this week's World Conservation Congress in Barcelona to much fanfare. But fighting deforestation, which has claimed almost half the island's forest cover since 1985, will not be an easy task, especially if it means locking horns with the powerful pulp and paper industry. In March, International Paper announced plans to invest $4 billion in Indonesia. It's the largest paper company in the world and according to a study done by the University of Massachusetts Amherst, it's also the 27th highest corporate polluter in America. Finding a solution to this complex problem requires hefty amounts of political will. Indonesia's government has made a significant step in the right direction. Hopefully the paper on which they ultimately print their plan will be recycled.

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Indonesian Officials Unveil a Deal to Protect Forests" (New York Times, October 9, 2008)
  • Visit the Rainforest Action Network Web site
GET INVOLVED
  • Donate $15 to protect one acre of tropical forest through Conservation International
  • Send a Save Our Earth letter urging world governments to make forest conservation a top priority
  • Sign the "We Can Solve It" petition for a global treaty on climate change
  • Analyze and reduce your impact on the environment with the National Grid Floe
photo: timekin

Friday, October 10, 2008

The Sixth Extinction

There are 5,487 species of mammals that have been identified. We are one of them. Now the most comprehensive study of these mammals in the last twelve years has revealed that not only are half in decline, but a fourth are dying out. We are in the middle of what has been dubbed the "sixth extinction." It's happened five other times in Earth's history and is the focus of this week's International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) World Conservation Congress. The culprits this time around are all the usual suspects: man-made global warming, pollution, overfishing and expanding human development for tourism, agriculture and industry.

IUCN director-general Julia Marton-Lefèvre said, “Within our lifetime, hundreds of species could be lost as a result of our own actions, a frightening sign of what is happening to the ecosystems where they live." Can these species be saved? The 8,000 decision-makers -- representing world governments, academia, NGOs and the United Nations -- now in Barcelona for the IUCN Congress are certainly going to try. For the Iberian lynx (pictured), perhaps it's fitting that the discussion is happening in its neck of the woods, where only about 100 adults remain, all in Spain and Portugal. David Biello wrote in Scientific American, "If the loss of one quarter of our economy provokes the mother of all financial bailouts, perhaps the loss of one quarter of our closest relatives merits the same action." But for the baiji, a freshwater dolphin found only in the Yangtze River -- known as the "Goddess of the Yangtze" -- it's likely too late. Not seen in four years, this goddess is a victim of China's overfishing and coastal degradation. Along with 29 other species, she's on the "probably extinct" list.

GET INFORMED
  • Read "Maul of the Wild: Sixth Extinction Wipes out Animals Worldwide" (Scientific American, October 9, 2008)
  • Read "One in four mammals face extinction according to Red List" and view a slideshow of endangered species (Times UK, October 7, 2008)
  • Visit the IUCN 2008 Congress Web site
  • Read the IUCN "Red List" of endangered species
GET INVOLVED
  • Donate to support Conservation International campaigns to protect biodiversity hotspots around the globe
  • Do these ten things recommended by Countdown 2010 to help stop biodiversity loss
  • Sign a petition to the United Nations to show your support of biodiversity
photo: C Francisco Marquez/ILCP/PA (Times UK)